On Linda Hutcheon's "A Theory of Adaptation"


Adaptation itself is debated among scholars and critics. It is considered to be both a process and a product, “repetition without replication,” and “both (re-)interpretation and then (re-)creation.” Works may be adapted from one format to another - from a poem into a song or a novel into a musical. An example is The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald by Canadian singer-songwriter Gordon Lightfoot[1]. In this case, song lyrics were written about an actual historical event, but the music used was a “mournful melody of an old Irish folk song.”[2] So, both the historical record of the event and the music it is set to were adapted to create the song. Adaptations may also be from existing stories that have been reinterpreted or recreated from a different point of view; think of the musical Wicked (from the alleged villain’s point of view) as opposed to The Wizard of Oz[3].  In this case, both format and point of view were adapted, as Wicked (the musical) is based on a novel, the novel is based on a movie, and the movie is based on yet another novel[4]. Further, historical events may be fictionalized, as is seen with nearly every Clive Cussler novel[5]. This includes Sahara, which was then adapted into a movie starring Matthew McConaughey in 2005[6]. Also, think of the blockbuster movie Braveheart, which was based on the medieval Scotsman, William Wallace[7].
Adaptations can be relayed to audiences in different ways, and there are three modes of engagement. Telling, showing, and interacting each allow different levels of participation with works. Oral traditions, novels, poetry, and the written word in general, allow for the audience to participate within their own imaginations; consequently, visual images are created within the viewers’ mind’s-eye. When a work is shown to an audience (in the form of film, television, or photography), the aforementioned mental images have already been created by the artist in advance. While this removes that portion of participation from the viewer, it allows the mind to make associations with previous works or experiences in that viewer’s existence. What does that image remind me of that I have seen in my past? How does that tie into the present viewing experience? With the interacting form of engagement, the viewer is most actively involved. This includes role play scenarios (such as Civil War reenactments), but the most common form comes with a joystick or game console. Video games allow the player to most actively participate in the narrative, though it may not remain true to the original story line if based on a literary work. However, as long as the story’s theme remains intact, the form is able to change in accordance with adaptation theorists criteria.

No comments:

Post a Comment