No Cats in Solvay in Chaplin’s Modern Times

Solvay, a small village on the western edge of Syracuse, is a working class neighborhood with a disturbing urban legend. Austrian immigrants after WWI were rumored to utilize stray animals as a protein source, and “Children in the area were told not to eat a meal containing rabbit at an Austrian, Tyrolese or Piedmontese home, because the meat was really cat."[1] My husband’s late grandfather was a lifelong Solvay resident. He expounded on the urban legend by informing the family that immigrants may have started the practice after The Great War, but there were residents of all nationalities that ate whatever was available to survive during the depression; details were intentionally omitted with a wink. Between 1923 and 1939 (according to urban legend) there were no cats in Solvay. As a result of the October 1929 stock market crash, subsequent bank failures, and the affects of reduced consumer spending on manufactured goods, the “unemployment rate rose above 25%.” Drought conditions impacted American farmers, and though prices were reduced, affordable food was difficult to obtain.[2] Charles Chaplin’s Modern Times, released in 1936, targeted the painful and widespread socioeconomic issues of the age with humor and compassion, thereby easing the content’s delivery for audiences of the day. However, like a 1930’s Nostradamus, Chaplin’s vision (though exaggerated for comedic effect) of unrealistic employer expectations, unemployment, and hunger during the modern industrialized times of The Great Depression is eerily accurate in the post-millennial age. Both then and now, unofficial employer requirements on employees can be unrealistic and dehumanizing, unemployment is difficult to remedy and even more problematic to measure, and consistently empty bellies create a lifetime hunger difficult to sate.
Chaplin’s Modern Times opens with the metaphorical comparison between sheep being herded to probable slaughter and factory workers arriving for their shift. For food and perceived security, both animals and men blindly follow the being in front of them, unaware of (or disregarding) the possibility of exploitation or death at the hands of an authoritative power. Charley Chaplin, The Little Tramp, is the black sheep; he is different and cannot follow blindly indefinitely. Once inside the steel mill, the master switch is activated, the factory comes to life, and viewers see how little the steel company president actually does. However, his demands for increased productivity at employee expense become clear. After repetitive increases in production speed, Charley is finally able to take a break, but he is unable to cease the physically repetitive wrench cranking motion after clocking out. His bathroom break is interrupted when the back wall illuminates into a technologically advanced telepresence screen. Instead of enjoying a cigarette, Charley is ordered back to the manufacturing line. His disengaged attitude is evident as the comedian files his nails, makes fun of his co-worker, and comically procrastinates before returning to his post. He is then forced, like a guinea pig, to demonstrate a new automated feeding machine, which was designed to improve productivity by removing the need for employee lunch breaks. Mechanical failure causes the machine to feed Charley its own bolts, and it’s no surprise when the black sheep can take no more. When manufacturing speed is increased yet again, Charley cannot keep up and rides the conveyor belt to be sucked into the machine in what appears to be a deliberately submissive act of “if you can’t beat them, join them.” His sanity is fully lost by the time he is ejected from the gears; dancing and humor cannot repair the loss of productivity caused by the incident, nor can it save Charley’s job as he displays childlike and mentally unstable behavior. Charley has become a liability and has to go.        
Employer expectations since Charley turned wrenches on the manufacturing line during the depression have changed, but the message remains the same; I pay you, therefore I own you. While employees within unions are afforded some protection, those under an exempt or salary status (that do not qualify for overtime) have become the new work horses of the post-millennial age. Gone are the days of 9-5. Instead, salaried workers begin before the office opens and don’t quit when the office closes; holidays, weekends, vacations, after-hours, and overnights are no longer considered going above and beyond – it is expected that work is done whenever it arrives. “Deciding when, where, and how to be accessible for work is an ongoing challenge, particularly for executives with families… The pressures and demands on executives are intense, multidirectional, and unceasing.”[3] Metrics define success, bathroom breaks are interrupted with requests from the next stall, and the explanation of “bio break” is a standard response should a salaried employee inadvertently miss an unplanned call or office visit. Lunch may not be provided by a machine yet, but dedicated team players remain at their desks to catch up on emails during meal times. Disengagement, resentment, and animosity are battled but inevitable as employees are expected to sacrifice constantly. Even when behavior and performance surpass expectations, and employee awards are presented, there is always room for improvement; annual performance coaching is required in the corporate culture. Furthermore, extreme dedication still does not guarantee job security. Exempt employees in the post-millennial age have followed Charley into the machine.
While the post-millennial work force is affected by mergers, acquisitions, downsizing, and the export of jobs to other countries, Charley loses his employment with his sanity in the machine; FMLA was not signed into law until 1993, and the Tramp’s admission into a mental institution would have cost him his job.[4] Viewers of Modern Times are not provided with Charley’s back-story, and we can only assume that he has no family when he is unceremoniously dumped onto the street after being released from the asylum. Through sheer coincidence, he is sent to jail; unemployment, potential homelessness, and the widespread hunger that others experienced during The Great Depression were delayed while his sentence was served. After his reluctantly received release, Charley’s ever-present version of Murphy’s Law causes him to be fired from the shipyard. He then meets Gamin (the film’s leading lady) and joyfully accepts a return ticket to jail for her crime of stealing bread. Instead of another stay as a guest of the state, an accident occurs, and our duo makes their escape. Charley decides (after a pleasant suburban daydream with Gamin) that he will work to ensure they are able to afford the life and security they have seen in their imaginations. The job search begins, and the Tramp is briefly exposed to the awkward nature of working midnight shift; any job is better than no job when options are limited and the government is no longer footing the bill. Charley was lucky – until his unemployed former steel mill colleagues break in to the department store where he is working as night watchman. “By 1933 … some 13 to 15 million Americans were unemployed and nearly half of the country’s banks had failed.[5] Comparatively, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ October 2016 report, unemployment rates fell 0.1 percent month over month to 4.9 percent.[6]U.S.Current Population Survey” was initiated because the government felt that counting each unemployed person monthly was “impractical.”[7] However, Americans have become notoriously finicky about answering inbound phone calls from numbers with unknown or unrecognizable caller IDs. In fact, experts blame caller ID on recent electoral polling failure.[8]  Furthermore, land line phones are nearly extinct, and cell phone numbers are unlisted in most cases. Per The New York Times, of the survey participants actually reached, only those actively looking for work are tallied; contacted individuals who gave up hope of finding employment are not included in unemployment statistics. This means that the labor market could actually be worsening while unemployment numbers remain flat or even decrease. [9] Consequently, the vital unemployment number (on which America judges our economic health) is obtained by an archaic method, is likely tinted in rose colored glass, and is almost certainly inaccurate. Economists therefore recommend that the monthly numbers be taken “with a grain of salt…”[10]
            Chaplin’s portrayal of food and feast throughout Modern Times seems metaphorical; tasty tidbits peppering the film seem to fill an unspecified but implied void within the characters. However, anyone who has known hunger for a prolonged period of time and filled an agonizingly empty belly with water, coffee, or whatever was available recognizes the imagery as literal. A 40 year old Charles Chaplin knew first hand what the poor and food insecure population faced when the stock market crashed in 1929. Born in 1889, the comedian and his brother were forced to fend for themselves after the illness and death of their parents.[11] Undoubtedly, his early years were imprinted with the precious nature of food that only deficiency can teach. Between 1923 and 1939, Americans were hungry; some joined convents, those like the Tramp willingly went to jail for a cot and a hot meal, and residents in Solvay allegedly ate cats. “Many families sought to cope by planting gardens, canning food, buying used bread…Despite a steep decline in food prices, many families did without milk or meat.”[12] When financial constraints occur, the quality and quantity of food purchased and consumed is often the first sacrifice. For the post-millennial population, steak and pizza are replaced with Ramen Noodles and canned tuna, but during the depression, the perception of food in America changed. The plethora of The Jazz Age morphed into every mother since yelling “Clean your plate! There are starving children in Africa!” Though American deaths from actual starvation during the depression were surprisingly low, malnutrition was common.[13] Chaplin’s idealistic daydream of a suburban home with fruit trees outside and a cow ready for milking says it all without a word of dialog; a surplus of healthy food within arms reach is nirvana. Charley and Gamin’s day dream is not metaphorical; it is the actual longing and desire of individuals who have been truly hungry beyond just skipping a meal or dieting. The frame of mind for those who have been truly hungry is forever altered; dreams are no longer of fortune and fame but of the food they can buy. Prolonged hunger is an experience that no one should endure but all should be aware of. Chaplin’s vision of a sustenance producing home indicates that he understood first hand the hunger experienced by audiences during the depression.
The American economy lost consciousness after 1929, and it remained comatose until the engines supporting World War II activated the economical defibrillator. Similarly, the post-millennial recession and housing crisis of the mid-2000s prompt today’s workers to tolerate unreasonable employer demands in order to prevent unemployment and subsequent poverty induced hunger. Since Charles Chaplin’s Modern Times was released, technological advances, social programs, and cultural changes have eased the affects of widespread socioeconomic issues. Nevertheless, Chaplin’s vision of an industrialized America remains accurate; unrealistic employer expectations continue, unemployment remains a problem, and hunger has not been alleviated. Though humor, self-depreciating slapstick, and exaggeration were delivery mechanisms, the message Chaplin relays in his last silent film is clear. You, the unemployed, hungry, underdog, and unlucky are not alone; this too shall pass. “Buck up - never say die. We’ll get along!”  



[1] Jesse. “There are not cats in Solvay but there are urban legends.” York Staters. Feb. 2006. yorkstaters.blogspot.com/2006/02/there-are-not-cats-in-solvay-but-there.html. Accessed 7 Nov. 2016.
[2] Kelly, Martin. “Top Five Causes of the Great Depression.” About Education. Aug. 2016. americanhistory.about.com/od/greatdepression/tp/greatdepression.htm. Accessed 7 Nov. 2016.

[3] Abrahams, Robin, and Boris Groysberg. “Manage Your Work, Manage Your Life.” Harvard Business Review.  Mar. 2014. hbr.org/2014/03/manage-your-work-manage-your-life. Accessed 11 Nov. 2016.
[4] “History of FMLA” Labor Law Center. www.laborlawcenter.com/education-center/history-of-fmla/. Accessed 11 Nov. 2016.
[5] “The Great Depression.” History.com. www.history.com/topics/great-depression. Accessed 11 Nov. 2016.
[6]United States Unemployment Rate 1948-2016.” Trading Economics. www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate. Accessed 11 Nov. 2016.
[7] “Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey.” United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 8 Oct. 2015. www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm. Accessed 11 Nov. 2016.
[8] Cassino, Dan. “Why Pollsters Were Completely and Utterly Wrong.” Harvard Business Review. Nov. 2016. hbr.org/2016/11/why-pollsters-were-completely-and-utterly-wrong. Accessed 9 Nov. 2016.
[9] Leonhardt, David. “Unemployed, and Skewing the Picture.” The New York Times. Mar. 2008. www.nytimes.com/2008/03/05/business/05leonhardt.html. Accessed 7 Nov. 2016.
[10] Fox, Justin. “What’s Really Wrong With the Unemployment Rate.” Bloomberg View. Aug. 2016. www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-08-10/what-s-really-wrong-with-the-unemployment-rate. Accessed 7 Nov. 2016.
[11] “Overview of His Life, Childhood.” Charlie Chaplin – Offiicial Website. www.charliechaplin.com/en/biography/articles/21-Overview-of-His-Life. Accessed 8, Nov. 2016.
[12] “The Human Toll.” Digital History. www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=2&psid=3434. Accessed 12, Nov. 2016.
[13] “Americans React to the Great Depression.” Teacher Resources,­ Library of Congress. www.loc.gov/teachers/classroommaterials/presentationsandactivities/presentations/timeline/depwwii/depress/depress.html. Accessed 12 Nov. 2016.

No comments:

Post a Comment